Books · Central Park · Technology

Why I ‘d Much Rather Read a Tree Book Than an E-Book

Tree book and E-book(s)
Tree book and E-book(s)

I appreciate the digital revolution; I really do. For starters,  Amazon has changed my life because shopping—for everything —is so simple. I don’t tweet, but I do have Facebook friends. My cell phone is so dumb all it knows how to do is to make and receive phone calls; however I do own the latest model of the Kindle e-reader.

But after six months or so, I’ve come to the conclusion that reading a tree book—or a real book,  if you will—offers subtle satisfactions that reading the same book on an e-reader simply does not, and I much prefer the real thing.

My objections to the Kindle stem mainly from the fact that you have to deal with it one page at a time. I hadn’t realized until I got the Kindle how often I fan the pages of a book, looking for information I’ve forgotten or to see what’s coming, or to see if I have time to finish the chapter before I have to struggle with the slotted spoon. I like to feel the weight of the pages on the left increasing as I read. in other words, I like to relate to the whole book at once.

Also, I like to write in my books. I figured out long ago that it’s okay. God doesn’t care. They are, after all, my books. Of course I would never write in someone else’s book or a library book (curses on those who do) but I love to scribble in mine. I like to pick up a book I’ve already read, fan the pages looking for the stars, the underlines, and the marginal notes I’ve made in my own handwriting and read those best parts again.

I like the fact that the real books have different personalities quite apart from their content. Some of them are fat, some thin. They are different colors. Some of them are friendly; some are not. As far as I’m concerned a really friendly book lies flat when it’s open, and has pages with ample margins. If there are notes, they’re in the margin or at the foot of the page, not at the end. If there are illustrations, I like them near the related text, not stuffed in the middle together. If, in addition the book is well written and tells me something I don’t already know, then it’s a good friend indeed. All e-books look more or less the same. That’s boring

I like to know where my books are—and I do. They’re on the bookshelves and I can identify them just by looking at the spines; I don’t want them dancing off into the atmosphere when I’m not looking. Finally, I love bookmarks. I collect them—and like to use them.

To be fair I should say there are advantages to the Kindle that I appreciate: you can make the type bigger, it’s easier to read lying down (something I like to do) because the book literally weighs nothing. All you have to hold is the reader itself. You can read in the dark (good if the person next to you is trying to sleep), there are lots of free books available from various sources, including the library. And if you read on the go—on the bus, in the line at the grocery store, or on an airplane or train, then I suppose an e-book is preferable to a real book. But when all is said and done, for me it’s no contest.

The Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis  Reservoir in Central Park
The Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis Reservoir in Central Park

MY LOCATION As I write this, I’m sitting on a bench next to the Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis Reservoir in Central Park. When it was built in 1862, it provided water for the city. Today it is maintained as a scenic attraction and wildlife refuge. A 1.58-mile track encircles it, and waterfowl make it their home.

Behind me is an allee of cherry trees, now in bloom. Their beauty is breathtaking. And somewhere there is something fragrant blooming. Herb is here too, reading— on his Kindle.

A perfect day.

The Cherry Trees Behind Me
The Cherry Trees Behind Me and a Runner in Hot Pink Shoes

8 thoughts on “Why I ‘d Much Rather Read a Tree Book Than an E-Book

  1. Oh, I couldn’t agree more for all the same reasons you have stated and would hate to think that technology could eventually replace the availability of libraries and book stores. I have a library one block from my apt. and would be lost without it. What I read on the inside of a book jacket and the reviews of the book by other authors helps in selecting a book I will enjoy. On my bookshelf are books I often refer to as a research source and I treasure several inscribed books written by friends. I doubt if the new technology could ever replace those pleasures.


    1. I guess the libraries and book stores will continue to be with us. But what they offer seems to be more and more technological fare. I believe the library will even lend you an e-reader to read the e-books. My neighborhood B&N devotes considerable floor space and personnel to their “Nook.” I agree; the pleasures of a real book just can’t be duplicated.


  2. I must admit to being hooked on my e-reader. I can sit up at night reading without disturbing my husband with my bedside lamp, and can pack three books for a long trip by simply packing my e-reader–not that I have read more than one book on a trip since my son was born. I also love that I can instantly look a word up, and do a search for a given word or name in the book. I’ve gotten pretty spoiled by that. That said, nothing beats a library book! Or admiring the respectable heft of a 500-page book after I’ve finished reading it. I recently finished a very long book on my e-reader, then I went looking for it at the library JUST to hold it in my hand for that sense of pride and gratification! (But I *was* glad I didn’t have to lug it around with me while I read it.) We read to our son from children’s books that have been passed down through generations–I suspect we may even own original editions of Dr. Seuss! Nothing can compare to that, it is simply priceless. And I, too, collect bookmarks and adore using them. There will never be a full replacement, not ever!


    1. I hadn’t even thought of children’s books! But now that you mention it, I realize that they are available on the IPad. Oh, horrors! Please, parents, continue to cuddle up with your child and a real book. You supply the “voices.” and let their imagination animate the pictures.


  3. Completely agree. I have never read a book on an electronic device. I have read plays on the computer, but they are hard to read in any form, I think. I agree with all the reasons you give but I have another good reason. I love throwing books I hate across the room. Or slamming them closed. Or dropping them on the floor and hearing that loud slap! Not a good idea with the Kindle. Tree books are more fun. Just don’t ever use those Cherry Trees to make a book. Oh my. What beauty grows on this earth.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Good heavens. Maybe it’s in the genes. I distinctly remember throwing a book against the wall when I was in graduate school Some claptrap about Byron’s poetry, I think.


    1. Thanks very much. I haven’t given up completely on the Kindle. What I mainly use it for is light reading (novels, a memoir) when I’m on the train or know I’m going to have to wait in a doctor’s office.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.